Undergraduate Journal of Political Science
The ÁùÉ«Íø, Pomona Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is our department's scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include American politics, public administration, international relations, comparative politics, public law and political theory. The Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is a student-run journal.
Senior Editor-in-Chief 2024:
Kyle Chao
Junior Editor-in-Chief 2024:
Amary Corona
Faculty Advisors:
Dr. Elli Menounou (emenounou@cpp.edu)
Current Issue: Volume 8, Issue 1, Spring 2024
Previous Issues:
- Volume 7 (2023)
- Volume 6 (2022)
- Volume 5 (2021)
- Volume 4 (2020)
- Volume 3 (2018)
- Volume 2 (2017)
- Volume 1 (2016)
Previous Editors:
- 2023: Sofia Rosales and Kyle Chao
- 2022: Nicolas Hernandez-Florez and Sofia Rosales
- 2021: Natalie Kassar and Nicolas Hernandez-Florez
- 2020: Sandra Escobar and Natalie Kassar
- 2018: Kristen Khair and Samara Renteria
- 2017: Tara Kwan and Kristen Khair
- 2016: Tara Kwan
Editors Kyle Chao and Amary Corona, in addition to faculty advisor Dr. Menounoum, introduce this volume of the undergraduate journal. In addition, take a look at this year's editorial board.
Click here to read (PDF)
As the power dynamics in the world continue to change, the idea of global superpowers does too. With Russia’s influence falling since the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States’ role as the sole hegemonic power waning and China rising in East Asia, there is the opinion that other countries could also rise to superpower status, one of those being India. This thesis explores the three forms of power that superpowers use; military, economic, and soft power to examine the potential of India to become a superpower, using a case study of both the United States and China as comparisons. The thesis comes to the conclusion that India does possess the tools necessary to become a superpower, but it still has many challenges to overcome, stemming from their status as a still developing country.
As the United States political landscape has evolved, so has the Latine population. The Latine population has grown in both size and political influence. Despite their growing size, Latine votes at some of the lowest rates in elections at every level. Many have attributed this lack of participation to the lack of political representation, group consciousness, and political salience. To address the disparities in political engagement, this thesis argues that political representation, group consciousness, and political salience will all have a positive effect on the mobilization of Latine students at Cal Poly Pomona. The findings show that each variable does positively impact voter turnout for Latine students.
Around the mid-20th century, the Philippines, Thailand, and Cambodia all became theaters of communist rebellion, availing themselves to the political interests of regional and global powers. Direct and indirect support during these rebellions reiterates the commonplace internationalization of intrastate conflicts. Yet the drastic variations in outcome between these cases introduces an important question: How did third-party intervention affect the tractability of communist rebellions in Southeast Asia? Drawing from archival records and the Uppsala Data Conflict Program's External Support Dataset, this thesis analyzes how third-party intervention transforms the landscape of intrastate conflicts by expanding the network of actor relations beyond the traditional incumbent-rebel dyad. Within this network lie multiple combinations of interdepencies and interactions that impact the balance of power between intrastate parties. Because of this, interstate rivalries between third parties can escalate the stakes of the conflict by shifting the distribution of resources or by altering the bargaining environment. This paper argues that, because of this system of dynamics, protraction is a process that can be incubated by the external party as early as the decision-making phase preceding intervention.
The current Supreme Court of The United States of America faces a never seen 6-3 supermajority court coalition. Literature and research suggest that supreme court justices are not immune to polarization. Median justices also play a big impact on the decision directions the court takes on landmark cases. In this thesis, we will explore the role of median justices throughout different recent court terms over the last ten years and how they affect policy output. We will analyze a trend in landmark decision making in the absence of a median justice and delve into the effect this has had on supreme court decisions. This thesis aims to analyze the effects that a median Justice Kennedy (and lack of) has had in recent decision outputs that have altered the direction of our nation from a previously liberal to a more conservative direction.